Hey there! Today we have an exciting comparison for you between two top thermal optics on the market: the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50. In this in-depth video, we will cover all the essential details such as optic specs, price points, exterior design, battery setup and life, media storage, user friendliness, general similarities, negative points, and comparison footage.
Let’s take a closer look. The ATN ThOR 4 offers a 4.5-18x magnification with a 384 by 288 sensor, while the Pulsar Thermion XM50 has a 5.5-22x magnification with a 40 by 240 sensor. The ATN ThOR 4 comes with a price tag of $2,700, whereas the Pulsar Thermion XM50 costs $3,800. Both optics have 30mm tubes and are quite similar in weight. The ATN ThOR 4 boasts a longer battery life of 18 hours, but the Pulsar Thermion XM50 comes with both an internal and external battery, providing around 6 hours of runtime. Both optics have exceptional features like live video streaming, customizable reticles, color palettes, rangefinder function, and video and photo recording capabilities. So, whether you’re an avid hunter or someone interested in thermal optics, this video by 4MR Ranch will help you make an informed decision.
Optic Specs Comparison
When comparing the optic specs of the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50, there are a few key differences to be aware of. The ATN ThOR 4 offers a 4.5-18x magnification and a 384 by 288 sensor resolution. On the other hand, the Pulsar Thermion XM50 has a 5.5-22x magnification and a 40 by 240 sensor resolution. These specifications can have a significant impact on image clarity and zoom functionality, so it’s important to consider your specific needs and preferences when choosing between the two.
Price Comparison
In terms of price, it’s worth noting that the ATN ThOR 4 is priced at $2,700, while the Pulsar Thermion XM50 costs $3,800. This $1,100 price difference may be a deciding factor for some individuals, especially those who are on a tight budget. However, it’s important to consider the overall value and features provided by each optic before making a purchasing decision, as the higher-priced option may offer additional benefits that justify the higher cost.
Exterior Walk Around
When examining the exterior design of the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50, it’s clear that they have different aesthetics. The Pulsar Thermion XM50 has a more traditional rifle scope appearance, while the ATN ThOR 4 has made efforts to resemble a traditional rifle scope, but with some distinctive features. Both optics have 30mm tubes, which means they can be used with traditional rings and mounts. This is advantageous as it allows for compatibility with existing setups and eliminates the need for proprietary mounts or bases.
Battery Setup and Life
One crucial factor to consider in thermal optics is battery life. The ATN ThOR 4 features an internal battery that provides an impressive 18 hours of runtime. This means you can use the scope for extended periods without worrying about the battery dying. On the other hand, the Pulsar Thermion XM50 utilizes both an internal and an external battery. While this offers the benefit of easily swapping out batteries, the total runtime is approximately 6 hours. It’s worth noting that the external battery option allows for charging on the go, giving you the flexibility to extend battery life during longer outings.
Media Storage
When it comes to media storage, the ATN ThOR 4 uses a removable SD card for storing recorded videos and photos. This provides the convenience of easily transferring media to other devices for sharing or editing. On the other hand, the Pulsar Thermion XM50 has internal storage, which may be more convenient for some users who prefer not to deal with external storage devices like SD cards. However, this means that media must be transferred directly from the optic to a computer or other compatible device.
User Friendliness
Both the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 offer a range of user-friendly features to enhance the overall experience. These include live video streaming, customizable reticles, color palettes, rangefinder functions, and the ability to record videos and take photos. However, there are some differences in the user interface and functionality. The ATN ThOR 4 has better display brightness and zoom functionality compared to the Pulsar Thermion XM50, which may be important factors to consider for those prioritizing ease of use and clear visuals.
General Similarities
Despite their differences, the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 share several similarities. Both optics have 30mm tubes, making them compatible with traditional rings and mounts. Additionally, they are relatively similar in weight, with the ATN ThOR 4 weighing 2.2 pounds and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 weighing 1.98 pounds. These similarities can make it easier for users to transition between optics or utilize existing equipment with either option.
Negative Points
In any comparison, it’s important to consider the negative points of each product so you can make an informed decision. For the ATN ThOR 4, some users may find its battery setup less convenient compared to the Pulsar Thermion XM50, considering it has a shorter runtime and requires the use of an external battery. Additionally, the Pulsar Thermion XM50 lacks rings and has a lower display resolution compared to the ATN ThOR 4. These factors may be significant to users who prioritize battery life, ease of use, and visual quality.
Comparison Footage
To better understand the image clarity and quality offered by the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50, it’s helpful to access comparison footage. These videos provide side-by-side demonstrations and allow users to draw their own conclusions based on their personal preferences and needs. By watching these comparisons, you can gain valuable insights into how each optic performs in different scenarios and make a more informed decision regarding which one is best for you.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the ATN ThOR 4 and the Pulsar Thermion XM50 are both impressive thermal optics with their respective strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual preferences, needs, and budget. The ATN ThOR 4 offers a 4.5-18x magnification with a 384 by 288 sensor, longer battery life, removable SD card storage, and better display brightness and zoom functionality. On the other hand, the Pulsar Thermion XM50 boasts a 5.5-22x magnification with a 40 by 240 sensor, an IP67 rating for better weather resistance, and internal storage. By considering the optic specs, price, exterior design, battery setup and life, media storage, user friendliness, general similarities, negative points, and comparison footage, you can make an informed decision and choose the thermal optic that best suits your needs.
