Hey everyone, welcome to 4 Mar ranch! Today, I’ll be giving you a quick comparison between two ATN thermal optics: the ThOR LT and the ThOR 4. If you’re on the fence between these two optics, I hope to address your questions about their differences, features, and specs so that I can help you make a better decision. The ThOR 4 is ATN’s flagship smart thermal optic, while the ThOR LT is a more basic, lower-cost option. The ThOR 4 has higher sensor resolutions ranging from 384 to 640, compared to the ThOR LT’s range of 160 to 320. It also offers additional features like video recording, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, and a ballistic calculator. On the other hand, the ThOR LT is a more streamlined option for those who prioritize functionality over advanced features. The base price for the ThOR 4 is around $2,000, while the ThOR LT starts at approximately $1,700 for the 320 sensor variant. There are more resolution options available for the ThOR 4, with prices going up to almost $5,000 for higher sensors. The video, by 4MR Ranch, discusses personal experiences with the 320 sensor in the ThOR 4 and covers details about thermal sensitivity, menu systems, and user-friendly interfaces. The author suggests that the choice between the ThOR LT and the ThOR 4 depends on personal preferences, budget, and the desire for simplicity or more features. They also recommend checking independent reviews for more detailed information.
Features
Sensor Resolutions: ThOR 4 vs ThOR LT
When considering the differences between the ATN ThOR 4 and ThOR LT line of thermal optics, one of the major factors to consider is the sensor resolutions. The ThOR 4 offers higher sensor resolutions compared to the ThOR LT. The ThOR 4 ranges from 384 to 640, while the ThOR LT ranges from 160 to 320. This means that the ThOR 4 has more options for resolution, allowing for greater clarity and detail in thermal imaging. If having the highest quality sensor resolution is important to you, then the ThOR 4 may be the better choice.
Additional Features: ThOR 4
Another important aspect to consider when comparing the ThOR 4 and ThOR LT is the additional features offered by the ThOR 4. The ThOR 4 comes equipped with several extra features that may be appealing to users who want more functionality from their thermal optic. One standout feature of the ThOR 4 is its ability to record video. This allows users to capture and review their hunting experiences or outdoor adventures. The ThOR 4 also has Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, which allows users to connect to ATN’s proprietary app and interact with the optic using a smart device. The app allows for changing reticles and viewing a library of recorded media. Additionally, the ThOR 4 has a ballistic calculator onboard, which can be useful for hunters who want to make precise and accurate shots by considering factors such as muzzle velocity, bullet weight, and ballistic coefficient. These additional features make the ThOR 4 a versatile and advanced option for those who value functionality and convenience.
Streamlined Functionality: ThOR LT
On the other hand, the ThOR LT offers a more streamlined and simplified experience. It is a more basic, lower-cost option compared to the ThOR 4. While it may not have all the extra features of the ThOR 4, the ThOR LT still provides reliable thermal imaging without any unnecessary frills. For users who prioritize functionality and a straightforward interface, the ThOR LT may be the preferred choice. Its simplicity makes it easy to use and less overwhelming for those who may not require all the advanced features of the ThOR 4.
Price
Base Price: ThOR 4 vs ThOR LT
Price is always an important factor to consider when purchasing any product, and it is no different when comparing the ThOR 4 and ThOR LT. The base price of the ThOR 4 starts at around $2,000, while the ThOR LT starts at approximately $1,700 for the 320 sensor variant. This means that the ThOR 4 is slightly more expensive than the ThOR LT at its base level. However, it is essential to keep in mind that the ThOR 4 offers higher sensor resolutions and additional features that contribute to its higher price. It is important to evaluate your budget and determine which features are worth the extra cost for your specific needs.
Higher Sensor Options: ThOR 4
Although the base price of the ThOR 4 may already be higher than the ThOR LT, it is worth noting that the ThOR 4 offers more resolution options. The price of the ThOR 4 can go up to almost $5,000 for higher sensors, such as 384 or 640. If having the highest quality sensor resolution is a priority for you, you may need to consider the higher-priced options of the ThOR 4. However, it is important to assess whether the increased resolution is necessary for your specific applications and if it justifies the higher cost.
Personal Experience
Author’s Experience with ThOR 4 320 Sensor
In the video from 4MR Ranch, the author shares their personal experience with the ThOR 4, specifically with the 320 sensor variant. They highlight the thermal sensitivity of the ThOR 4, mentioning a non-scientific test they conducted to measure close-range thermal sensitivity. The author observed their dog’s paw prints on the carpet and noted that both the ThOR 4 and ThOR LT were able to detect the minimal thermal energy transferred from the dog’s paw to the carpet. This demonstrated that both optics have excellent thermal sensitivity for detecting even small changes in thermal energy. The author also mentions that both the ThOR 4 and ThOR LT have impressive detection ranges, with the capability to detect objects over 2000 yards away under clear line of sight conditions and without interference. From their personal experience, the author concludes that there is no significant difference in thermal sensitivity between the ThOR LT and ThOR 4.
Thermal Sensitivity
Thermal Sensitivity Test
To assess the thermal sensitivity of the ATN ThOR 4 and ThOR LT, the author conducted a non-scientific test by observing dog paw prints on a carpet. They note that the thermal energy transferred from the dog’s paws to the carpet is minimal but still detectable by both optics. This indicates that both the ThOR 4 and ThOR LT possess impressive thermal sensitivity, allowing them to detect even slight changes in thermal energy. The ability to detect these minute differences is crucial for users who rely on thermal optics for hunting, tracking, or surveillance purposes.
Detection Range
Both the ThOR 4 and ThOR LT, as mentioned by the author, have long-range sensitivity. They are capable of detecting objects over 2000 yards away when there is a clear line of sight and no interference. This long detection range makes both optics suitable for various applications, including hunting, search and rescue operations, and wildlife observation. The ability to detect objects at such distances ensures that users can observe and monitor targets from a safe distance while maintaining a high level of situational awareness.
Design and Interface
Weight Comparison
In terms of design, one consideration to keep in mind is the weight of the optics. The ThOR LT is lighter than the ThOR 4, weighing 1.6 pounds compared to 2.2 pounds. The lighter weight of the ThOR LT may be advantageous for users who prioritize portability and maneuverability, such as hunters who need to carry their optics for extended periods. However, it is essential to balance weight with other factors, such as resolution and features, to determine the most suitable optic for your needs.
Menu System
When considering the interface of the optics, the ThOR 4 and ThOR LT have different menu systems. The ThOR 4 has a more complicated menu system due to its additional features and functionalities. This may require a bit more time and effort to navigate and customize settings according to individual preferences. On the other hand, the ThOR LT has a more user-friendly interface, with a quick zoom button and external control for adjusting brightness and contrast. The user-friendly interface of the ThOR LT makes it easier for users to operate the optic efficiently and make quick adjustments in the field.
User-friendly Interface
For users who value simplicity and ease of use, the ThOR LT may be the preferred choice. Its user-friendly interface allows for straightforward operation, making it accessible to users of all skill levels. Whether you are a seasoned professional or a beginner, the ThOR LT’s intuitive interface ensures that you can quickly adapt to the optic and utilize its capabilities without complications. Additionally, the ThOR LT’s external control for adjusting brightness and contrast provides quick and convenient adjustments for optimal viewing in various conditions.
Choosing the Right Optic
Considerations
When it comes to choosing between the ThOR 4 and ThOR LT, there are several considerations to keep in mind. First and foremost is your budget. The ThOR 4 is generally more expensive than the ThOR LT, with additional features and higher sensor resolutions contributing to its higher price. It is essential to assess your specific needs and determine if the extra cost is justified for the features and functionalities offered by the ThOR 4. If you prioritize simplicity and streamlined functionality, the ThOR LT may be the more suitable option within your budget.
Another consideration is your intended usage. If you require advanced features such as video recording, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, and a ballistic calculator, then the ThOR 4 may be the better choice for you. These features offer enhanced functionality and convenience, making the ThOR 4 a versatile optic for a variety of applications. However, if you simply need reliable thermal imaging capabilities without the need for additional features, the ThOR LT can fulfill your requirements while offering a more affordable and straightforward option.
Independent Reviews
To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the ThOR 4 and ThOR LT’s performance and capabilities, it is recommended to check independent reviews. Independent reviews provide objective assessments and insights from professionals and experts who have extensively tested and evaluated the optics. These reviews can offer valuable information on factors such as image quality, durability, battery life, and overall performance. Considering the opinions and experiences of others can help you make an informed decision based on real-world experiences and expert analysis.
Conclusion
Gratitude to Viewers
In conclusion, the comparison between the ATN ThOR 4 and ThOR LT line of thermal optics reveals important differences and considerations for potential buyers. The ThOR 4 offers higher sensor resolutions, additional features, and a more advanced menu system, making it the flagship smart thermal optic. On the other hand, the ThOR LT provides streamlined functionality, a user-friendly interface, and a more affordable price point.
Final Thoughts
Ultimately, the choice between the ThOR 4 and ThOR LT depends on your personal preferences, budget, and the level of functionality you require. Consider factors such as sensor resolutions, additional features, weight, menu systems, and user-friendliness. It is important to evaluate your specific needs and prioritize the features that are most essential to you. Whether you choose the ThOR 4 or ThOR LT, both optics offer reliable thermal imaging capabilities that can enhance your outdoor experiences, hunting trips, and security operations. Remember to conduct thorough research, read independent reviews, and weigh your options before making a final decision.
